City of Topeka v. Myers

Supreme Court of Kansas

City of Topeka v. Myers

35 Kan. 554

DecidedJuly 15, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Kan. 554 (City of Topeka v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Topeka v. Myers, 35 Kan. 554 (kan 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The evidence produced .upon the motion for a rehearing is painfully conflicting as to what actually occurred upon the trial in the court below with respect to the conduct of the counsel for appellee; but it is not necessary to determine what is proved or disproved as to those matters. The only question before us is, whether the bill of exceptions embraced in the record has been changed since it was allowed and signed by the district court. The evidence does not establish that any change therein has been made. Under these circumstances, the motion for a rehearing must be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The evidence produced .upon the motion for a rehearing is painfully conflicting as to what actually occurred upon the trial in the court below with respect to the conduct of the counsel for appellee; but it is not necessary to determine what is proved or disproved as to those matters. The only question before us is, whether the bill of exceptions embraced in the record has been changed since it was allowed and signed by the district court. The evidence does not establish that any change therein has been made. Under these circumstances, the motion for a rehearing must be overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Kan. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-topeka-v-myers-kan-1886.