City of Topeka v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kansas

City of Topeka v. Martin

590 P.2d 106, 3 Kan. App. 2d 105, 1979 Kan. App. LEXIS 174

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kansas

DecidedFebruary 9, 1979

Docket50,095

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 590 P.2d 106 (City of Topeka v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Topeka v. Martin, 590 P.2d 106, 3 Kan. App. 2d 105, 1979 Kan. App. LEXIS 174 (kanctapp 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in that there has been no sentence imposed or other disposition made which constitutes a final judgment as required by K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 22-3601(a), -3602(a), and K.S.A. 22-3608(1).

The defendant was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The trial court did not impose sentence or take any other action that can be construed as an appeal-able order in view of the specific requirements in 22-3608(1) that sentence be imposed.

An order finding a defendant guilty is not an appealable order and may not be appealed until the defendant is sentenced or the imposition of sentence is suspended pursuant to 22-3608. State v. Woodbury, 133 Kan. 1, 298 Pac. 794 (1931); Roberts v. State, 197 Kan. 687, 689, 421 P.2d 48 (1966); 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law § 525, p. 509; 24 C.J.S., Criminal Law §§ 1556, 1648,1649, 1653.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI