City of Topeka v. Clark

Supreme Court of Kansas

City of Topeka v. Clark

88 P. 1134, 75 Kan. 856, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 162

Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 5, 1907·No. No. 14,840·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We have examined the errors claimed to have been made upon the trial of this case and have found nothing which requires a reversal of the judgment rendered or which calls for extended discussion. The evidence fully sustains the special findings and the general verdict, and the verdict compels the judgment. The legal principles involved are quite fully discussed in Evans v. Concordia, 74 Kan. 70, 85 Pac. 813.

There seems to have been a fair trial, the evidence as well as the findings seem to establish the liability of the city for the injury sustained, and it is not claimed that the damages awarded are excessive.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We have examined the errors claimed to have been made upon the trial of this case and have found nothing which requires a reversal of the judgment rendered or which calls for extended discussion. The evidence fully sustains the special findings and the general verdict, and the verdict compels the judgment. The legal principles involved are quite fully discussed in Evans v. Concordia, 74 Kan. 70, 85 Pac. 813.

There seems to have been a fair trial, the evidence as well as the findings seem to establish the liability of the city for the injury sustained, and it is not claimed that the damages awarded are excessive.

The judgment is affirmed.

City of Topeka v. Clark, 88 P. 1134, 75 Kan. 856, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 162 (kan 1907).

Pincite

88 P. 1134 (City of Topeka v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related