City of Toledo v. Ross

777 N.E.2d 265, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1211
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 6, 2002
DocketNo. 2001-1815
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 777 N.E.2d 265 (City of Toledo v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Toledo v. Ross, 777 N.E.2d 265, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1211 (Ohio 2002).

Opinions

{¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed as moot.

Moyer, C.J., Grendell, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toledo v. Ross
2002 Ohio 5780 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 N.E.2d 265, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-toledo-v-ross-ohio-2002.