City of Toledo v. Board of Education

48 Ohio St. (N.S.) 83
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 1891·Published

Opinion

By the Court :

The plaintiff, the city of Toledo for the use of the contractor, is not entitled to the relief prayed for, nor, under the prayer for general relief, can a judgment be rendered against the Board of Education for the payment of the amount of the assessment out of the contingent fund of. the board, authorized to be raised by section 3958 Revised Statutes. The amount must be paid out of the general fund of the city.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Toledo v. Board of Education, 48 Ohio St. (N.S.) 83 (Ohio 1891).

48 Ohio St. (N.S.) 83 (City of Toledo v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.