City of Tampa v. Kelliher

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Tampa v. Kelliher

155 So. 925, 115 Fla. 698, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1670

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 6, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been duly submitted, briefed and orally argued, and all the questions presented by the respective parties having been carefully considered, our conclusion is that the final decree appealed from is free from error and that it should be and the same is hereby affirmed. In reaching this conclusion, it was not found necessary to pass upon the constitutionality of Chapter 15,-536 of the Acts of 1931.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having been duly submitted, briefed and orally argued, and all the questions presented by the respective parties having been carefully considered, our conclusion is that the final decree appealed from is free from error and that it should be and the same is hereby affirmed. In reaching this conclusion, it was not found necessary to pass upon the constitutionality of Chapter 15,-536 of the Acts of 1931.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

City of Tampa v. Kelliher, 155 So. 925, 115 Fla. 698, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1670 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

155 So. 925 (City of Tampa v. Kelliher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.