City of Tacoma v. Hoffman
This text of 72 F.2d 721 (City of Tacoma v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is substantial evidence to support the verdict and judgment. There are no exceptions to the charge to the jury. The assignments of error do not properly challenge rulings on the evidence. Most of such rulings^ moreover, were not prejudicial by reason of the charge of the court withdrawing from the consideration of the jury the issues to which such evidence was addressed. The judgment is affirmed, the application of appellee for the imposition of a penalty for a frivolous appeal is denied, as the judgment bears interest at 6 per cent., and the appeal was evidently undertaken and prosecuted in good faith.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 F.2d 721, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-tacoma-v-hoffman-ca9-1934.