City of Tacoma v. Heinricy
68 P.2d 1031, 190 Wash. 710, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 402
This text of 68 P.2d 1031 (City of Tacoma v. Heinricy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Tacoma v. Heinricy, 68 P.2d 1031, 190 Wash. 710, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 402 (Wash. 1937).
Opinion
The defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion that gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. On authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Tacoma v. Roe
68 P.2d 1028 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 P.2d 1031, 190 Wash. 710, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-tacoma-v-heinricy-wash-1937.