City of Tacoma v. Heinricy
68 P.2d 1031, 190 Wash. 710, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 402
Opinion
The defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion that gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. On authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Tacoma v. Heinricy, 68 P.2d 1031, 190 Wash. 710, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 402 (Wash. 1937).
68 P.2d 1031 (City of Tacoma v. Heinricy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Tacoma v. Roe
68 P.2d 1028 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)