City of Tacoma v. Currington
68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 709, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 399
This text of 68 P.2d 1030 (City of Tacoma v. Currington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Tacoma v. Currington, 68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 709, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 399 (Wash. 1937).
Opinion
Defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the occasion which gave rise to the prosecution in the case of Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. The facts in this case bring the case within the rule laid down in that case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Tacoma v. Roe
68 P.2d 1028 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 709, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-tacoma-v-currington-wash-1937.