City of Tacoma v. Currington

68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 709, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 399
Washington Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1937·No. No. 26521. Department One.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the occasion which gave rise to the prosecution in the case of Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. The facts in this case bring the case within the rule laid down in that case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Tacoma v. Currington, 68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 709, 1937 Wash. LEXIS 399 (Wash. 1937).

68 P.2d 1030 (City of Tacoma v. Currington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Tacoma v. Roe
68 P.2d 1028 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)