City of Tacoma v. Boyd
68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 710
Opinion
Defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion which gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. It is suggested in the briefs that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. The evidence, in our opinion, was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that all the elements of the offense defined by the ordinance were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Tacoma v. Boyd, 68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 710 (Wash. 1937).
68 P.2d 1030 (City of Tacoma v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Tacoma v. Roe
68 P.2d 1028 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)