City of Tacoma v. Boyd

Washington Supreme Court

City of Tacoma v. Boyd

68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 710

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedMay 24, 1937

DocketNo. 26523. Department One.

StatusPublished

This text of 68 P.2d 1030 (City of Tacoma v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Tacoma v. Boyd, 68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 710 (Wash. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion which gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. It is suggested in the briefs that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. The evidence, in our opinion, was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that all the elements of the offense defined by the ordinance were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion which gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. It is suggested in the briefs that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. The evidence, in our opinion, was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that all the elements of the offense defined by the ordinance were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 P.2d 1030, 190 Wash. 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-tacoma-v-boyd-wash-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack