City of Sunrise v. Town of Davie

472 So. 2d 458, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3494
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 27, 1985
DocketNo. 66690
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 472 So. 2d 458 (City of Sunrise v. Town of Davie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Sunrise v. Town of Davie, 472 So. 2d 458, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3494 (Fla. 1985).

Opinion

McDONALD, Justice.

The City of Sunrise, Florida seeks reversal of a final order denying its motion to intervene in a bond validation proceeding initiated by the Town of Davie, Florida.1 We affirm the trial court’s order.

Davie sought to validate approximately $35,000,000 of water and sewer bonds for the primary purpose of acquiring, constructing, improving, and expanding its present water and sewer system. Sunrise sought to intervene because it feared that Davie’s expansion would preempt services now being delivered by Sunrise in a portion of Davie.2 Davie, claiming that Sunrise had no standing and that it sought to raise an issue collateral to the scope of a bond validation hearing, objected to Sunrise’s intervention. The trial court agreed, disallowed the intervention, and approved the bonds.

We agree with Davie that Sunrise’s claim that a portion of the funds to be received from the sale of revenue bonds may possibly be used in violation of section 180.06, Florida Statutes (1983), is not a pertinent issue to be raised in the validation hearing. We find that McCoy Restaurants, Inc. v. City of Orlando, 392 So.2d 252 (Fla.1980), and State v. City of Daytona Beach, 431 So.2d 981 (Fla.1983), control. Hence, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying a motion to intervene when the motion sought to raise a matter not germane to the validation.3

The order of the trial judge denying intervention is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adhin v. First Horizon Home Loans
44 So. 3d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Litvak v. Scylla Properties, LLC
946 So. 2d 1165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Y.H. v. F.L.H.
784 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 So. 2d 458, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-sunrise-v-town-of-davie-fla-1985.