City of Sullivan v. Henry

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Sullivan v. Henry

204 Ill. App. 595

DecidedApril 16, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 204 Ill. App. 595 (City of Sullivan v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Sullivan v. Henry, 204 Ill. App. 595 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Justices oe the peace, § 193*—what is effect of amending defective hond. Even if an appeal bond on appeal from a justice of the peace is defective and has been accepted and approved by the proper officer, the party endeavoring to appeal should not be prejudiced by any informality or deficiency in the bond if he will, when objection is made, remedy the defect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Justices oe the peace, § 193*—what is effect of amending defective hond. Even if an appeal bond on appeal from a justice of the peace is defective and has been accepted and approved by the proper officer, the party endeavoring to appeal should not be prejudiced by any informality or deficiency in the bond if he will, when objection is made, remedy the defect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 Ill. App. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-sullivan-v-henry-illappct-1917.