City of Sullivan v. Henry

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Sullivan v. Henry

204 Ill. App. 595

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 16, 1917·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Justices oe the peace, § 193*—what is effect of amending defective hond. Even if an appeal bond on appeal from a justice of the peace is defective and has been accepted and approved by the proper officer, the party endeavoring to appeal should not be prejudiced by any informality or deficiency in the bond if he will, when objection is made, remedy the defect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Justices oe the peace, § 193*—what is effect of amending defective hond. Even if an appeal bond on appeal from a justice of the peace is defective and has been accepted and approved by the proper officer, the party endeavoring to appeal should not be prejudiced by any informality or deficiency in the bond if he will, when objection is made, remedy the defect.

City of Sullivan v. Henry, 204 Ill. App. 595 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

204 Ill. App. 595 (City of Sullivan v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.