City of Stuart v. Green

94 F.2d 942, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4549
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 19, 1938·No. No. 8437·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of this court reversing the judgment of the District Court for want of jurisdiction in that court was entered on July 15, 1937. Rehearing was denied August 13, 1937. A second application for rehearing was dimissed September 11, 1937. The opinion is silent as to costs. The mandate directed the taxing of only the costs of appeal against appellee. The motion is on the ground that this court having held that the District Court was without jurisdiction, no costs could be taxed. While -we held that the District Court was without-jurisdiction, this court had jurisdiction to reverse the judgment on that ground. The costs of appeal were therefore taxable. Where the opinion is silent as to costs, costs of appeal automatically follow the judgment.

No clerical error appearing, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Stuart v. Green, 94 F.2d 942, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4549 (5th Cir. 1938).

94 F.2d 942 (City of Stuart v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tomorrow's Choice, Inc. v. Bassing Co.
364 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Nash v. Raun
67 F. Supp. 212 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1946)