City of Stockton v. Clark
53 Cal. 82
This text of 53 Cal. 82 (City of Stockton v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Stockton v. Clark, 53 Cal. 82 (Cal. 1878).
Opinion
The notice inviting sealed proposals did not refer to a diagram and specifications of the proposed work, as required by the twenty-seventh section of the Act of March 27th, 1872, to reincorporate the City of Stockton, and for that reason the proceedings are invalid, and the defendant’s property did not become liable for the assessment.
Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 Cal. 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-stockton-v-clark-cal-1878.