City of Stockton v. Bacon

144 S.W. 484, 240 Mo. 482, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 147
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedFebruary 29, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 S.W. 484 (City of Stockton v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Stockton v. Bacon, 144 S.W. 484, 240 Mo. 482, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 147 (Mo. 1912).

Opinion

WOODSON, J.

The city of Stockton, a city of the fourth class, .instituted this suit, under section 5993, Revised Statutes 1899’, before the board of aider-men to condemn a tract of land, as an addition to and for cemetery purposes.

[483]*483All the proceedings seem to have been regular, which resulted, on March 16, 1906, in a judgment and decision assessing damages and benefits. From that judgment, the defendant, on July 11, 1906, appealed to the circuit court of Cedar county and the case was upon change of venue taken to the circuit court of Polk county.

Prior, however, to the talcing the change the appellant filed in the circuit court of Cedar county a demurrer to the proceedings and asked the court to dismiss the cause.

Also the respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and strike the case from the docket, because the appeal was not timely taken.

When the cause reached the circuit court of Polk county, the motion to dismiss the appeal was taken up and considered, and was by the court sustained.

Appellant saved her exceptions, and duly appealed the cause to the Kansas City Court of Appeals; and upon motion, the latter court transferred the cause to this court, for the reason stated, that the title to real estate was involved.

I. After a careful consideration of the case, we are satisfied that the title to real estate is not involved in this appeal.

If the circuit court of Polk county properly dismissed the appeal, because it was not taken in time, and should this court affirm that ruling, we would simply say as it said, the appeal was not timely taken and would .affirm the order of dismissal, and would no more pass upon the merits of the case, than did the circuit court.

And upon the other hand, should this court hold that the appeal was timely taken then, the order of dismissal would be set aside and the cause remanded to the circuit court to be tried upon its merits.

[484]*484In neither, case would the merits be involved, and in the very nature of things the title to the real estate could not be involved in this appeal.

The cause is, therefore, remanded to the Kansas City Court of Appeals.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Stockton v. Bacon
158 S.W. 728 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.W. 484, 240 Mo. 482, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-stockton-v-bacon-mo-1912.