City of Stamford v. Freedom of Information Commission
This text of 678 A.2d 512 (City of Stamford v. Freedom of Information Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant freedom of information commission ordered the plaintiff city of Stamford to release a report to the opposing party in a legal action that was pending in the Superior Court for the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk.
Stamford appealed to the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 4-183 and l-21i (d). The trial court held that the plaintiffs1 had not sustained their burden of proving the applicability of the statutory exemptions.
Stamford’s central claim on appeal to this court is that the report is exempt from disclosure as a record pertaining to strategy and negotiations with respect to pending claims pursuant to General Statutes § 1-19 (b) (4) and as a record affecting the rights of litigants under the state discovery laws pursuant to General Statutes § l-19b (b) (1).
We have fully reviewed the records and briefs and considered the oral arguments of the parties. Having applied the appropriate standard of review, we conclude that the trial court properly concluded that Stamford did not present sufficient evidence to support either exemption. We also conclude that the record does not support Stamford’s claims that the freedom of information commission improperly conducted the hearing.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 A.2d 512, 42 Conn. App. 39, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-stamford-v-freedom-of-information-commission-connappct-1996.