City of St. Petersburg v. Public Employees Relations Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of St. Petersburg v. Public Employees Relations Commission

398 So. 2d 980, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19757

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1684

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 398 So. 2d 980 (City of St. Petersburg v. Public Employees Relations Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of St. Petersburg v. Public Employees Relations Commission, 398 So. 2d 980, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19757 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order entered by the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) on August 19, 1980, required the City of St. Pe-tersburg to cease and desist from failing to take a ratification vote on the collective bargaining agreement arrived at between the City and the International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local No. 1220. Because of the peculiar factual circumstances concerning inclusion of Article X, section 4, we construe the order as not precluding the chief executive officer of the City from making recommendations to the City as to its inclusion in the agreement.

We reject all other contentions of the parties and we affirm the order as construed.

SCHEB, C. J., and GRIMES and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order entered by the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) on August 19, 1980, required the City of St. Pe-tersburg to cease and desist from failing to take a ratification vote on the collective bargaining agreement arrived at between the City and the International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local No. 1220. Because of the peculiar factual circumstances concerning inclusion of Article X, section 4, we construe the order as not precluding the chief executive officer of the City from making recommendations to the City as to its inclusion in the agreement.

We reject all other contentions of the parties and we affirm the order as construed.

SCHEB, C. J., and GRIMES and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

398 So. 2d 980, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-petersburg-v-public-employees-relations-commission-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack