City of St. Petersburg v. Mellen

Supreme Court of Florida

City of St. Petersburg v. Mellen

188 So. 332, 137 Fla. 431

DecidedApril 28, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 332 (City of St. Petersburg v. Mellen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of St. Petersburg v. Mellen, 188 So. 332, 137 Fla. 431 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

*432 Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the interlocutory orders appealed from denying the motions to dismis's the bill of complaint and to strike portions of the bill of complaint herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having, been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised, of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said interlocutory orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court, that the said orders' of the Circuit Court be, and the same are,hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and BROWN-and Chapman, J. -J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*432 Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the interlocutory orders appealed from denying the motions to dismis's the bill of complaint and to strike portions of the bill of complaint herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having, been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised, of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said interlocutory orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court, that the said orders' of the Circuit Court be, and the same are,hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and BROWN-and Chapman, J. -J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 So. 332, 137 Fla. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-petersburg-v-mellen-fla-1939.