City of St. Petersburg ex rel. St. Petersburg Police Department ex rel. State v. Drosis
443 So. 2d 349, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25353
Opinion
Appellant seeks to appeal a nonfinal order granting appellees’ motion to strike appellant’s amended petition for rule to show cause and for final order of forfeiture. We sua sponte dismiss the appeal. See Guth v. Howard, 362 So.2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
We have considered appellant’s contention that the appeal comes within the provision of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) and find it to be without merit.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of St. Petersburg ex rel. St. Petersburg Police Department ex rel. State v. Drosis, 443 So. 2d 349, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
443 So. 2d 349 (City of St. Petersburg ex rel. St. Petersburg Police Department ex rel. State v. Drosis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guth v. Howard
362 So. 2d 725 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)