City of St. Louis v. Young

138 S.W. 11, 235 Mo. 63, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 80
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of St. Louis v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 Mo. 44
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 1, 1911·No. No. 2·Published

Opinion

BROWN, C.

— The record in this case is substantially the same as in the case of City of St. Louis v.. Harry Young and Henry Henning, reported at page 44 of this Report, with which it was submitted, and, for the reasons stated in that case, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Correction is affirmed.

Blair, C., concurs;

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All .the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of St. Louis v. Young, 138 S.W. 11, 235 Mo. 63, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 80 (Mo. 1911).

138 S.W. 11 (City of St. Louis v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.