City of St. Louis v. Woodward

Supreme Court of Missouri

City of St. Louis v. Woodward

139 S.W. 345, 235 Mo. 521, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 114

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided July 1, 1911·Published

Opinion

BLAIR, C.

— The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of City of St. Louis v. Prank E. Williams, reported at page 503 of this Report. Por the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment in this is reversed.

Brown, C., concurs.

PER CURIAM.

— The foregoing opinion of Blair, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All the judges concur except Valliant, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLAIR, C.

— The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of City of St. Louis v. Prank E. Williams, reported at page 503 of this Report. Por the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment in this is reversed.

Brown, C., concurs.

PER CURIAM.

— The foregoing opinion of Blair, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All the judges concur except Valliant, J., who dissents.

City of St. Louis v. Woodward, 139 S.W. 345, 235 Mo. 521, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 114 (Mo. 1911).

Pincite

139 S.W. 345 (City of St. Louis v. Woodward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.