City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.

174 S.W. 109, 263 Mo. 507, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 163

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJanuary 25, 1915

DocketNos. 17524, 17526, 17527, 17528 and 17570

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 S.W. 109 (City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co., 174 S.W. 109, 263 Mo. 507, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 163 (Mo. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, J.

The five eases above numerically designated and identical as to the respective parties thereto, involve the same issues and are determined by the same principles of law declared by this court in case numbered 17254 and entitled “City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant,” decided at this' term. The judgments, therefore, in said cases numbered 17524, 17526, 17527, 17528 and 17570 are affirmed for the reasons stated in said case numbered 17254. And it is so ordered.

Lamm, G. J., and Woodson and Brown, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in an opinion filed in 17254, in which Bond and Faris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, J.

The five eases above numerically designated and identical as to the respective parties thereto, involve the same issues and are determined by the same principles of law declared by this court in case numbered 17254 and entitled “City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant,” decided at this' term. The judgments, therefore, in said cases numbered 17524, 17526, 17527, 17528 and 17570 are affirmed for the reasons stated in said case numbered 17254. And it is so ordered.

Lamm, G. J., and Woodson and Brown, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in an opinion filed in 17254, in which Bond and Faris, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 S.W. 109, 263 Mo. 507, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-louis-v-united-railways-co-mo-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack