City of St. Louis v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

City of St. Louis v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

174 S.W. 109, 263 Mo. 508, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 164

DecidedJanuary 25, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 174 S.W. 109 (City of St. Louis v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of St. Louis v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co., 174 S.W. 109, 263 Mo. 508, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 164 (Mo. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, J.

This case involves the same issues and is controlled by like principles of law declared by this court in City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant, numbered 17254, decided at this term, therefore, the judgment in this case (No. 17525) is affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Lamm, G. J., and Woodson and Brotvn, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in a separate opinion filed in No. 17254, in which Bond and Paris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, J.

This case involves the same issues and is controlled by like principles of law declared by this court in City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant, numbered 17254, decided at this term, therefore, the judgment in this case (No. 17525) is affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Lamm, G. J., and Woodson and Brotvn, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in a separate opinion filed in No. 17254, in which Bond and Paris, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 S.W. 109, 263 Mo. 508, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-louis-v-st-louis-suburban-railway-co-mo-1915.