City of St. Louis v. Schefe

Supreme Court of Missouri

City of St. Louis v. Schefe

67 S.W. 1100, 167 Mo. 666, 1902 Mo. LEXIS 157

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedMarch 19, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 S.W. 1100 (City of St. Louis v. Schefe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of St. Louis v. Schefe, 67 S.W. 1100, 167 Mo. 666, 1902 Mo. LEXIS 157 (Mo. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

GANTT, J.

This is an action by the city of St. Louis to recover a fine of five hundred dollars for a violation of section 5 of an ordinance of said city, No. 18407, providing that no person within the limits of said city shall thereafter erect, build or maintain a dairy or cow stable, without having first received permission so to do by proper ordinance. The cause was tried on an agreed statement of facts and defendant was fined $100 by the court of criminal correction. As he challenged the constitutionality of the ordinance, the appeal was sent to this court.

All 'the questions raised in argument and brief have been passed on in the case of the City of St. Louis v. Fischer, 167 Mo. 654, which was heard at the same time. For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day rendered in that case, the judgment of the court of criminal correction is affirmed.

All concur, except Sherwood, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GANTT, J.

This is an action by the city of St. Louis to recover a fine of five hundred dollars for a violation of section 5 of an ordinance of said city, No. 18407, providing that no person within the limits of said city shall thereafter erect, build or maintain a dairy or cow stable, without having first received permission so to do by proper ordinance. The cause was tried on an agreed statement of facts and defendant was fined $100 by the court of criminal correction. As he challenged the constitutionality of the ordinance, the appeal was sent to this court.

All 'the questions raised in argument and brief have been passed on in the case of the City of St. Louis v. Fischer, 167 Mo. 654, which was heard at the same time. For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day rendered in that case, the judgment of the court of criminal correction is affirmed.

All concur, except Sherwood, J., who dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.W. 1100, 167 Mo. 666, 1902 Mo. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-louis-v-schefe-mo-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack