City of St. Louis v. Foster

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of St. Louis v. Foster

716 S.W.2d 491, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4688

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 1986·No. No. 50926·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, who was convicted of municipal ordinance violations, appeals from an order dismissing his applications for trial de novo in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, who was convicted of municipal ordinance violations, appeals from an order dismissing his applications for trial de novo in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

City of St. Louis v. Foster, 716 S.W.2d 491, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4688 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

716 S.W.2d 491 (City of St. Louis v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.