City of St. Louis v. Coffee

76 Mo. App. 318, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 189
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 1, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 76 Mo. App. 318 (City of St. Louis v. Coffee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of St. Louis v. Coffee, 76 Mo. App. 318, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 189 (Mo. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

Biggs, J.

This is an action by the city of St. Louis to recover the penalty for a violation of a city ordinance. Such an action is civil and not criminal. City of St. Louis v. Vert, 84 Mo. 204; Ex parte Hollwedell, 74 Mo. 395. There can be no question that the city of St. Louis is a political subdivision of the state. Riddle v. Brown, 37 Mo. App. 550; Freeman v. St. Louis Quarry Co., 30 Mo. App. 362. It follows that under the amendments to the constitution establishing and limiting the jurisdiction of this court, the jurisdiction of this appeal is lodged in the supreme court. The cause will be.transferred to that court for final determination.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Hollwedell
74 Mo. 395 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1881)
City of St. Louis v. Vert
84 Mo. 204 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Freeman v. St. Louis Quarry Co.
30 Mo. App. 362 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1888)
Riddle v. Brown
37 Mo. App. 550 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Mo. App. 318, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-louis-v-coffee-moctapp-1898.