City of St. Louis Park v. Bunkers

247 N.W.2d 404, 310 Minn. 431, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1664
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 8, 1976
Docket46398
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 247 N.W.2d 404 (City of St. Louis Park v. Bunkers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of St. Louis Park v. Bunkers, 247 N.W.2d 404, 310 Minn. 431, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1664 (Mich. 1976).

Opinion

*432 Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered in Hennepin County Municipal Court for driving under the influence and driving with .10 percent or more blood alcohol by weight contrary to a St. Louis Park ordinance in conformity with Minn. St. 169.121, subd. l(a, d). Defendant’s convictions were based in part upon results of a chemical test, the admission of which defendant challenges on two distinct grounds, specifically, the failure of the police to permit him to telephone counsel before deciding to submit to this test and the failure of police to advise him of his right to additional tests from a person of his own choosing until after he had submitted to testing. We do not need to reach the second issue because our disposition of the first issue requires us to reverse the convictions.

As we held in the case of Prideaux v. State, Department of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405, 247 N. W. 2d 385, filed herewith, when police arrest a driver for allegedly violating § 169.121, then under § 481.10 they must accede to any timely request by the driver for permission to telephone his lawyer before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing. As we stated in Prideaux, failure of the police to grant such a timely request will bar later revocation of the driver’s license under § 169.123 for refusal to submit to testing or, conversely, will bar use of the test results in a prosecution under § 169.121 should the driver consent to testing. The latter was the case here, and under the circumstances admission of the test results was improper.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Spokane v. Kruger
803 P.2d 305 (Washington Supreme Court, 1991)
Forte v. State
686 S.W.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
State v. Jones
457 A.2d 1116 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 N.W.2d 404, 310 Minn. 431, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-louis-park-v-bunkers-minn-1976.