City of St. Joseph v. Oliver

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of St. Joseph v. Oliver

201 S.W.3d 512, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1173, 2006 WL 2128826

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 1, 2006·No. No. WD 65310·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Darrin Oliver appeals his conviction in a jury trial for violation of St. Joseph municipal ordinance 20-76, stealing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Darrin Oliver appeals his conviction in a jury trial for violation of St. Joseph municipal ordinance 20-76, stealing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

City of St. Joseph v. Oliver, 201 S.W.3d 512, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1173, 2006 WL 2128826 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

201 S.W.3d 512 (City of St. Joseph v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.