City of St. Joseph v. Merlatt
This text of 26 Mo. 233 (City of St. Joseph v. Merlatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The opinion in the case of the State, to the use of Buchanan County, v. J. B. Smith and others, (ante p. 226,) will enable the court to determine the questions of law arising in this suit.
The first and second instructions given for the defendants were, under the circumstances, clearly erroneous. These in[235]*235structions were to the effect that payments made by a collector during a fiscal year will be presumed to have been paid out of moneys collected for that year. They were directly against the case of Draffen v. City of Boonville, 8 Mo. 395.
There was no case made in the pleadings for the recovery by the defendant of any excess of revenue overpaid for the year 1855. The other judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Mo. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-joseph-v-merlatt-mo-1858.