Home/Supreme Court of Missouri/City of St. Joseph v. Crowther

City of St. Joseph v. Crowther

43 S.W. 786, 142 Mo. 155, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 378
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedDecember 22, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 43 S.W. 786 (City of St. Joseph v. Crowther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of St. Joseph v. Crowther, 43 S.W. 786, 142 Mo. 155, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 378 (Mo. 1897).

Opinion

Gantt, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Buchanan county in a condemnation proceeding prosecuted by the city of St. Joseph for the extension of Tenth street in said city through the lands of E. C. Zimmerman. The ordinance appropriating the property for public use and defining the benefit district and the petition of the city praying for the appointment of commissioners to assess damages and benefits are conceded to be sufficient.

The appellant Zimmerman is the owner of a tract of land fronting four hundred and forty feet on Atchison street with a depth varying from seventy-six feet on Eleventh street to about two' hundred and twenty-eight feet on the west side. As will appear from the accompanying plat, Tenth street is open from the heart of the city of St. Joseph to the south line of city blocks 145 and'146 of South St. Joseph addition. By this proceeding it is proposed to extend Tenth street at a width of sixty feet 'through a tract known as the Noble tract to the north line of Turner & Kirkpatrick addition. The street is already dedicated and opened through the last named addition. Beginning at the south line of said addition, it is proposed to extend it across the Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad through appellant Zimmerman’s tract to Atchison street. It will necessitate the condemnation of a strip sixty feet wide and two hundred and twenty-eight feet, five inches deep north and south, and will leave a strip of ground west of and fronting on said new extension of the street two hundred and twenty-eight feet, five inches long by eighty feet deep.

Appellant filed his exceptions in the circuit court to the report of the commissioners, and the circuit [160]*160court having overruled the same, he appeals to this court.

[159]*159

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. McKee v. Clements
219 S.W. 900 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)
Hill v. Hill
193 S.W. 726 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
City of Springfield v. Owen
170 S.W. 1118 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
Shelby County Railway Co. v. Crawford
139 S.W. 115 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
Sisson v. Board of Supervisors
70 L.R.A. 440 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
St. Joseph v. Geiwitz
49 S.W. 1000 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 S.W. 786, 142 Mo. 155, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-joseph-v-crowther-mo-1897.