City of St. George v. Hudler

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of St. George v. Hudler

786 S.W.2d 198, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 433, 1990 WL 29821

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1990·No. No. 56593·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a court of exceeding the speed limit on Reavis Barracks Road in violation of ordinances of the City of St. George. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a court of exceeding the speed limit on Reavis Barracks Road in violation of ordinances of the City of St. George. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

City of St. George v. Hudler, 786 S.W.2d 198, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 433, 1990 WL 29821 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

786 S.W.2d 198 (City of St. George v. Hudler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.