City of St. Augustine v. Thompson
193 F. 1019, 113 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1112
Opinion
A majority of the judges are of opinion that the assignments of error based upon the six-months limitation found in the charter of the city of St. Augustine are not well taken. All agree that otherwise the case was correctly ruled, and should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of St. Augustine v. Thompson, 193 F. 1019, 113 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1112 (5th Cir. 1912).
193 F. 1019 (City of St. Augustine v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.