City of St. Augustine v. Thompson

193 F. 1019, 113 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1112
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 1912
DocketNo. 2,251
StatusPublished

This text of 193 F. 1019 (City of St. Augustine v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of St. Augustine v. Thompson, 193 F. 1019, 113 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1112 (5th Cir. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the judges are of opinion that the assignments of error based upon the six-months limitation found in the charter of the city of St. Augustine are not well taken. All agree that otherwise the case was correctly ruled, and should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 F. 1019, 113 C.C.A. 666, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-st-augustine-v-thompson-ca5-1912.