City of Springfield v. Sleeper
This text of 115 Mass. 587 (City of Springfield v. Sleeper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was within the discretion of the court to order the three cases to be tried together. The difference in the evidence, and the employment of distinct counsel by the defendants, were circumstances to be considered by the court below, but did not entitle the plaintiff as of right to separate trials. Witherlee v. Ocean Ins. Co. 24 Pick. 67. Kimball v. Thompson, 4 Cush. 441. Commonwealth v. Robinson, 1 Gray, 555. Commonwealth v. James, 99 Mass. 438. Commonwealth v. Powers, 109 Mass. 353. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 Mass. 587, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-springfield-v-sleeper-mass-1874.