City of Springfield v. Aquizap
927 P.2d 601, 144 Or. App. 190, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1468
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 16, 1996
Docket94-50059, CA A88648; 94-08395; CA A89019
StatusPublished
This text of 927 P.2d 601 (City of Springfield v. Aquizap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Springfield v. Aquizap, 927 P.2d 601, 144 Or. App. 190, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1468 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction of a violation of ORS 814.090(l)(a).1 The state concedes the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because ORS 814.090(l)(a) violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. We agree with the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 814.090
Oregon § 814.090
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
927 P.2d 601, 144 Or. App. 190, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-springfield-v-aquizap-orctapp-1996.