City of Southfield v. COVENSKY

746 N.W.2d 76, 480 Mich. 1137
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 24, 2008·No. 135556·Published

Opinion

746 N.W.2d 76 (2008)

CITY OF SOUTHFIELD and Southfield City Clerk, Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
Laurice COVENSKY, Respondent-Appellant, and
The Target Corporation, Respondent-Appellee.

Docket No. 135556. COA No. 273101.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 24, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Southfield v. COVENSKY, 746 N.W.2d 76, 480 Mich. 1137 (Mich. 2008).

746 N.W.2d 76 (City of Southfield v. COVENSKY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.