City of Shreveport v. Shreveport Canadian

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 12, 2003·No. 02-30785·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit May 12, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30785

CITY OF SHREVEPORT,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

SHREVEPORT CANADIAN FOOTBALL INC., BERNARD GLIEBERMAN,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana 97-CV-2353

Before DAVIS, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the

parties and argument of counsel, we are persuaded that the district

court did not err in concluding that Shreveport Pirates, Inc. (SPI)

was not a mandate or agent of Shreveport Canadian Football, Inc.

(Football). Because that is the only issue we left open for the

district court to consider on remand and because the district court

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. did not err in reaching this conclusion, we affirm the judgment of

the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Shreveport v. Shreveport Canadian, (5th Cir. 2003).

City of Shreveport v. Shreveport Canadian (City of Shreveport v. Shreveport Canadian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.