City of Sherman v. Williams

14 S.W. 130, 77 Tex. 310, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1121
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 16, 1890·No. No. 6432·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HENRY, Associate Justice.

—This suit was brought by appellee to recover' damages for a personal injury to her occasioned by a defective sidewalk. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for $500.

The statement of facts contained in the record was stricken out at a previous term of this court on the motion of appellee, because it was filed after the adjournment of the term at which the trial was had without an order of the court allowing it to be done.

Plaintiff’s petition shows that defendant was at the date of plaintiff’s injury an incorporated city under the general laws of this State.

In the absence of a statement of facts we can consider but one question made by appellant. It is contended that the court should have chargéd the jury at defendant’s request that defendant being a municipal corporation under the general laws of this State was not liable to plaintiff in this action. It would have been improper to so charge. Baugus v. Atlanta, 74 Texas, 629.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Delivered May 16, 1890.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Sherman v. Williams, 14 S.W. 130, 77 Tex. 310, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1121 (Tex. 1890).

14 S.W. 130 (City of Sherman v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Wichita Falls v. Crummer
71 S.W.2d 583 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Lenzen v. City of New Braunfels
35 S.W. 341 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1896)