City of Shelton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

City of Shelton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.

209 A.2d 189, 152 Conn. 744

DecidedApril 27, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.2d 189 (City of Shelton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Shelton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co., 209 A.2d 189, 152 Conn. 744 (Colo. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County, the motion by the parties that the above-entitled cases be assigned for hearing on the same date, that the appellees be permitted to file a single brief in the two cases and that the time for filing the appellees’ brief be determined by the filing date of the appellant’s brief in the second case is granted to the extent that (1) the parties in the above-entitled cases may be permitted, at the time of assignment, to request a hearing on the same date and (2) the appellees may file a single brief in both cases. The motion in all other respects is denied.

Submitted April 8 decided April 27, 1965 Leo Vine, corporation counsel, for the plaintiff appellant city of Shelton, and David M. Shea, for the plaintiff appellant The B. F. Goodrich Company, on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County, the motion by the parties that the above-entitled cases be assigned for hearing on the same date, that the appellees be permitted to file a single brief in the two cases and that the time for filing the appellees’ brief be determined by the filing date of the appellant’s brief in the second case is granted to the extent that (1) the parties in the above-entitled cases may be permitted, at the time of assignment, to request a hearing on the same date and (2) the appellees may file a single brief in both cases. The motion in all other respects is denied.

Submitted April 8 decided April 27, 1965 Leo Vine, corporation counsel, for the plaintiff appellant city of Shelton, and David M. Shea, for the plaintiff appellant The B. F. Goodrich Company, on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.2d 189, 152 Conn. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-shelton-v-connecticut-light-power-co-conn-1965.