City of Shelton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.

209 A.2d 189, 152 Conn. 744
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 27, 1965·Published

Opinion

In the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County, the motion by the parties that the above-entitled cases be assigned for hearing on the same date, that the appellees be permitted to file a single brief in the two cases and that the time for filing the appellees’ brief be determined by the filing date of the appellant’s brief in the second case is granted to the extent that (1) the parties in the above-entitled cases may be permitted, at the time of assignment, to request a hearing on the same date and (2) the appellees may file a single brief in both cases. The motion in all other respects is denied.

Submitted April 8 decided April 27, 1965 Leo Vine, corporation counsel, for the plaintiff appellant city of Shelton, and David M. Shea, for the plaintiff appellant The B. F. Goodrich Company, on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Shelton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co., 209 A.2d 189, 152 Conn. 744 (Colo. 1965).

209 A.2d 189 (City of Shelton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.