City of Shelton v. Carothers

Connecticut Appellate Court

City of Shelton v. Carothers

556 A.2d 1060, 18 Conn. App. 132, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 97

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 22, 1989

Docket7296

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 A.2d 1060 (City of Shelton v. Carothers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Shelton v. Carothers, 556 A.2d 1060, 18 Conn. App. 132, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 97 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs are appealing the decision of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeal because it was untimely served. We agree with the trial court.

[133]*133The plaintiffs failed to serve notice of their appeal within thirty days of the named defendant’s decision as required by General Statutes § 4-183 (b). Such failure to conform to the statute is fatal to the appeal. See, e.g., Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 205 Conn. 413, 419, 533 A.2d 879 (1987), aff’d on rehearing, 206 Conn. 374, 538 A.2d 202 (1988); Basilicato v. Department of Public Utility Control, 197 Conn. 320, 324, 497 A.2d 48 (1985); Rogers v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 195 Conn. 543, 550, 489 A.2d 368 (1985); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 17-18, 521 A.2d 208 (1987).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs are appealing the decision of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeal because it was untimely served. We agree with the trial court.

[133]*133The plaintiffs failed to serve notice of their appeal within thirty days of the named defendant’s decision as required by General Statutes § 4-183 (b). Such failure to conform to the statute is fatal to the appeal. See, e.g., Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 205 Conn. 413, 419, 533 A.2d 879 (1987), aff’d on rehearing, 206 Conn. 374, 538 A.2d 202 (1988); Basilicato v. Department of Public Utility Control, 197 Conn. 320, 324, 497 A.2d 48 (1985); Rogers v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 195 Conn. 543, 550, 489 A.2d 368 (1985); Hanson v. Department of Income Maintenance, 10 Conn. App. 14, 17-18, 521 A.2d 208 (1987).

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 A.2d 1060, 18 Conn. App. 132, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-shelton-v-carothers-connappct-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack