City of Shelby v. Lackey

69 S.E.2d 607, 235 N.C. 343, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 389
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 26, 1952·No. 309·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*344 PeR Curiam.

Tbe demurrer interposed in the court below was to the petition and motion only. The defendants did not demur to- the pleadings which the additional parties were permitted to adopt.

An appeal does not lie to the Supreme Court from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court, unless such order deprives the appellant of a substantial right which he might lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. G.S. 1-277; City of Raleigh v. Edwards, 234 N.C. 528, 67 S.E. 2d 669.

It is ordinarily within the discretion of the trial judge to .make additional parties. G.S. 1-163; Insurance Co. v. Motor Lines, 225 N.C. 588, 35 S.E. 2d 879; Wilmington v. Board of Education, 210 N.C. 197, 185 S.E. 767.

The order entered below making additional parties plaintiff did not impair any substantial right of the defendants which would warrant an appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Shelby v. Lackey, 69 S.E.2d 607, 235 N.C. 343, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 389 (N.C. 1952).

69 S.E.2d 607 (City of Shelby v. Lackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corbett v. Corbett
107 S.E.2d 165 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Childers v. Powell
92 S.E.2d 65 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.
76 S.E.2d 376 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)