City of Sedalia v. Dumsday

488 S.W.3d 732, 2016 WL 2338415, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 442
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2016·No. WD 78965·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert and Bessie Dumsday appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to City of Sedalia, Missouri (“the city”) on its petition for an order to remove the Dumsdays from their property so that the city could demolish the home there, which constituted a public nuisance pursuant to the city’s Code of Ordinances. The Dumsdays claim that the order of the city’s Board of Appeals. (“Board”) was not final because it made contradictory declarations and because it ordered future time[733] ly performance by Dumsdays, but they were not notified of any right to a further hearing when-they were determined not to have met the requirements of the order. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Sedalia v. Dumsday, 488 S.W.3d 732, 2016 WL 2338415, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

488 S.W.3d 732 (City of Sedalia v. Dumsday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.