City of Seattle v. Savage
174 P. 1183, 103 Wash. 71, 1918 Wash. LEXIS 1096
Opinion
— The refusal of the trial court to allow the filing of an amended complaint, upon an ap[72] peal, from a conviction of the violation of a city ordinance in the police court of the city of Seattle, was directly contrary to our holding in the case of Everett v. Cowles, 97 Wash. 396, 166 Pac. 786, and for that reason, the judgment of the lower court is reversed.
Main, C. J., Mount, Holcomb, and Chadwick, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Seattle v. Savage, 174 P. 1183, 103 Wash. 71, 1918 Wash. LEXIS 1096 (Wash. 1918).
174 P. 1183 (City of Seattle v. Savage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Getman v. Webster
75 P.2d 124 (Washington Supreme Court, 1938)
State v. Eckert
212 P. 551 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)