City of Seattle v. Jones

Washington Supreme Court

City of Seattle v. Jones

433 P.2d 867, 72 Wash. 2d 1046, 1967 Wash. LEXIS 892

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 16, 1967

DocketNo. 39269

StatusPublished

This text of 433 P.2d 867 (City of Seattle v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Seattle v. Jones, 433 P.2d 867, 72 Wash. 2d 1046, 1967 Wash. LEXIS 892 (Wash. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by Rochelle Jones from a conviction under Seattle Ordinance No. 73095, § 1, of agreeing to commit an act of prostitution.

It is defendant’s position that there was insufficient evidence of such an agreement to support the trial court’s verdict. We have carefully reviewed the arguments advanced by defendant in support of her position and find them to be without merit. See State v. Collins, 66 Wn.2d 71, 400 P.2d 793 (1965).

The judgment is affirmed and the cause will be remitted forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by Rochelle Jones from a conviction under Seattle Ordinance No. 73095, § 1, of agreeing to commit an act of prostitution.

It is defendant’s position that there was insufficient evidence of such an agreement to support the trial court’s verdict. We have carefully reviewed the arguments advanced by defendant in support of her position and find them to be without merit. See State v. Collins, 66 Wn.2d 71, 400 P.2d 793 (1965).

The judgment is affirmed and the cause will be remitted forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

433 P.2d 867, 72 Wash. 2d 1046, 1967 Wash. LEXIS 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-seattle-v-jones-wash-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack