City of Seattle v. DeAustria

Washington Supreme Court

City of Seattle v. DeAustria

420 P.2d 374, 69 Wash. 2d 975, 1966 Wash. LEXIS 1042

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 1, 1966

DocketNo. 38814

StatusPublished

This text of 420 P.2d 374 (City of Seattle v. DeAustria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Seattle v. DeAustria, 420 P.2d 374, 69 Wash. 2d 975, 1966 Wash. LEXIS 1042 (Wash. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of State v. Doolittle, ante p. 744, 419 P.2d 1012 (1966).

In justice to counsel for appellant, Alicia M. DeAustria, it should be stated that the opinion in State v. Doolittle, supra, was not filed until the day after the appeal in this case was argued. The Doolittle opinion disposes of all issues raised in the present case adversely to the contentions of the appellant, Mrs. DeAustria.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of State v. Doolittle, ante p. 744, 419 P.2d 1012 (1966).

In justice to counsel for appellant, Alicia M. DeAustria, it should be stated that the opinion in State v. Doolittle, supra, was not filed until the day after the appeal in this case was argued. The Doolittle opinion disposes of all issues raised in the present case adversely to the contentions of the appellant, Mrs. DeAustria.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 P.2d 374, 69 Wash. 2d 975, 1966 Wash. LEXIS 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-seattle-v-deaustria-wash-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack