City of Savannah v. Clarke
This text of 155 S.E. 790 (City of Savannah v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “It is not a prerequisite to suit- against a municipal corporation in this State, for injury to person or property, that the written notice required under the Civil Code, §■ 910, should specify any amount of money claimed as damages.” Maryon v. City of Atlanta, 149 Ga. 35 (99 S. E. 116), and cit.; same case, 23 Ga. App. 716 (99 S. E. 316). In the decision of this court in that case the contrary ruling in Mayor &c. of Macon v. Stringfield, 16 Ga. App. 480 (85 S. E. 684), was overruled.
2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case the petition as amended was not subject -to any ground- of the demurrer in- . terposed, and the demurrer, was properly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 S.E. 790, 42 Ga. App. 275, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-savannah-v-clarke-gactapp-1930.