City of Sarasota v. Rembrandt Corp.

168 So. 243, 123 Fla. 836, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1054
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 243 (City of Sarasota v. Rembrandt Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Sarasota v. Rembrandt Corp., 168 So. 243, 123 Fla. 836, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1054 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case is from an order denying motion to strike portions of the Bill of Complaint.

This is a companion case to the case of Strohmeyer v. Rembrandt Corporation, this day filed.

The order appealed from in this case should be and is hereby affirmed on the authority of the opinion and judgment in the said companion case of Strohmeyer v. Rembrandt Corporation.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur. Terrell, J., agrees to the conclusion. Ellis, P. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 243, 123 Fla. 836, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-sarasota-v-rembrandt-corp-fla-1936.