City of Salem v. Home Telephone & Tel. Co.

122 P. 290, 61 Or. 319, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 65
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 2, 1912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

Ordinance No. 595 evidently contemplates that the proposed Salem Home Telephone & Telegraph Company should give the bond, and the ordinance could not, by its terms, become effective until such bond was filed. The filing of a bond by the Home Telephone & Telegraph Company could not render the ordinance effective, and the conditions remain the same as though it had never been passed.

The ruling of the circuit court was. correct, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Burnett took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Salem v. Home Telephone & Tel. Co., 122 P. 290, 61 Or. 319, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 65 (Or. 1912).

122 P. 290 (City of Salem v. Home Telephone & Tel. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garvin v. Garvin
118 P.2d 768 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1941)