City of Roswell v. Monafo
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-38556
CITY OF ROSWELL,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOHN MONAFO,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY James M. Hudson, District Judge
Office of the City Attorney Parker W. Patterson Roswell, NM
for Appellee
John Monafo Roswell, NM
Pro Se Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VARGAS, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED. JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge
JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Roswell v. Monafo (City of Roswell v. Monafo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.