City of Rome v. Railroad Property Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of Rome v. Railroad Property Development Corp.

72 A.D.3d 1561, 898 N.Y.S.2d 910

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2010·Published

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered April 13, 2009. The order granted petitioner’s application for an administrative search warrant.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 6 and 19, 2010, and by Stephanie Eisenberg for respondent on April 8, 2010,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Peradotto, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered April 13, 2009. The order granted petitioner’s application for an administrative search warrant.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 6 and 19, 2010, and by Stephanie Eisenberg for respondent on April 8, 2010,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Peradotto, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.

City of Rome v. Railroad Property Development Corp., 72 A.D.3d 1561, 898 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

72 A.D.3d 1561 (City of Rome v. Railroad Property Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.