City of Rome v. Ragan
86 S.E. 59, 16 Ga. App. 736, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 211
This text of 86 S.E. 59 (City of Rome v. Ragan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Rome v. Ragan, 86 S.E. 59, 16 Ga. App. 736, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
1. There was evidence supporting the verdict.
2. It does not appear from either of the two grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial that the cause of the movant was sufficiently prejudiced to have required the grant of a new trial; and the rulings of the court are not, for the reasons stated, erroneous.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 59, 16 Ga. App. 736, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-rome-v-ragan-gactapp-1915.